High Court of Allahabad Orders
Interim orders, bail orders, stay orders, and daily directions from the High Court of Allahabad. AI-powered summaries for quick understanding.
BHC Denies Interim Injunction in Desai vs Mishra Property Dispute
The Bombay High Court upheld the lower court's decision to deny the Appellants' application for a temporary injunction against the Respondents, allowing the Respondents to create third-party rights in the disputed property. The Appellants, who claim ownership of the property, argued that the Respondents' continued occupation was unauthorized and detrimental to their rights.
Bombay HC Declares Lapse of Land Reservation in Yakub Contractor vs State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners, declaring that the reservation of land for development in Lonavala has lapsed due to the lack of action by the municipal council. This allows the petitioners to proceed with the development of the land in question.
Patna HC Upholds Conviction in Hare Ram Yadav vs State of Bihar Murder Case
The Patna High Court upheld the convictions of multiple appellants for murder and related offenses, confirming their life sentences and additional terms of imprisonment. The court found sufficient evidence supporting the trial court's judgment from December 2019, which had sentenced the appellants for their roles in the crime.
Delhi District Court Grants Enhanced Compensation in Narender Kumar vs Union of India
The court has granted an enhancement in compensation for land acquired from the petitioners in Khera Khurd, determining the market value at ₹19,80,750 per acre, as per a precedent case. The petitioners will also receive additional statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act.
Kerala HC Quashes Orders on Drainage Channel in K.P.Narayanan Nambiar vs P.M.Krishnan Namboodiri
The Kerala High Court quashed the orders of the Sub Divisional Magistrate that directed the petitioner to restore a natural drainage channel on his property, ruling that the issue should be resolved in civil court rather than through criminal proceedings. The court found that the rights claimed by the temple authorities over the drainage channel were private easement rights, not established by law.
Delhi JM Acquits Vishal Saini in Rash Driving Case
The court acquitted Vishal Saini of charges under Sections 279 and 304A of the IPC, concluding that the prosecution failed to prove the elements of rashness or negligence due to the absence of the key eyewitness. The acquittal was based on the lack of evidence linking the accused's actions to the alleged crime.