High Court of Andhra Pradesh Judgments
Recent judgments and landmark decisions from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. AI-powered summaries for quick understanding.
Recent judgments and landmark decisions from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. AI-powered summaries for quick understanding.
The case involves a petition filed under Section 438(1) seeking to suspend a sentence imposed by the Special Judge for offences under the SC/ST (PoA) Act. The petitioner requested bail pending the disposal of a criminal revision. The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the petition, suspending the sentence and granting bail under specific conditions. The matter is set for further hearing on 13 March 2026.
Read moreThe case involves an application filed by the petitioner seeking an extension of interim bail due to medical reasons. The petitioner suffered a brain stroke and is undergoing treatment, making it difficult for him to manage daily activities. The court granted the extension of interim bail for an additional two months, maintaining the original conditions. The petitioner is required to surrender to the prison authorities by a specified date.
Read more
The case WP/6637/2023 was brought before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh concerning a legal issue, but on the date of the final judgment, there was no representation for the petitioner. The court decided to list the case for hearing again after three weeks. This indicates a procedural delay rather than a substantive ruling on the merits of the case.
Read moreThe case WP/16246/2024 involves a petition filed by A.P.S.P.D.C.L. concerning a legal matter that required further hearings. The court, led by Justice NJS, acknowledged the request from the counsel to list the case for another hearing. The decision to adjourn the case indicates ongoing legal proceedings rather than a final resolution at this stage.
Read moreBodipovu Thirupathamma filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the State of Andhra Pradesh in attempting to create a new Gram Panchayat from Ankepalli Gram Panchayat without following the required procedures. The petitioner argued that the bifurcation was illegal and arbitrary as it did not adhere to the guidelines set forth in G.O.Ms.No.542. The court acknowledged the procedural issues raised and scheduled a further hearing to examine the original records related to the Gram Sabha meeting. The case highlights the importance of following administrative procedures in local governance.
Read moreThe case involves a writ petition filed by Govvala Rajesh Kumar and others against the State of Andhra Pradesh and others regarding the unauthorized conversion of a residential property into a hospital by the 9th respondent. The petitioners alleged that the official respondents failed to take action against this conversion, which was done without the necessary permissions. The court acknowledged the inaction of the officials and noted that the construction had been completed despite a notice issued by the Panchayat Secretary. The matter is set for further consideration on March 5, 2026.
Read moreJoin 50,000+ legal professionals