Interim orders, bail orders, stay orders, and daily directions from the High Court of Karnataka. AI-powered summaries for quick understanding.
The High Court of Karnataka directed the trial court to consider and pass orders on a temporary injunction application within one month. Additionally, both parties are prohibited from alienating or encumbering the suit property until the trial court's decision on the injunction is made.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Official Liquidator of Mysore Kirloskar Ltd. seeking to declare a lease agreement with M/S. Kirloskar Institute of Advanced Management Studies void. The court upheld the earlier ruling that the application was barred by limitation, preventing the Official Liquidator from canceling the lease and settling creditor claims.
The Karnataka High Court heard a petition from Rahul Gandhi seeking to quash defamation proceedings initiated by the Bharatiya Janata Party. The court considered arguments from both sides regarding the validity of the complaint and the alleged defamatory advertisement, ultimately deciding on the merits of the case.
The Karnataka High Court upheld the order of the lower court that temporarily restrains State Bank of India from taking any action regarding the corporate guarantee provided by Patel Engineering Limited until the resolution of the ongoing suit. This decision prevents SBI from pursuing recovery actions related to the guarantee during the pendency of the case.
The High Court of Karnataka disposed of Sandeep's appeal for anticipatory bail, allowing him to surrender before the Special Judge. Upon surrender, the Special Judge is directed to consider his regular bail application without undue delay.
The High Court of Karnataka has addressed a writ petition filed by tenants of commercial shops in K.R. Pete, challenging the proposed e-auction of their leased properties. The court acknowledged the tenants' right to exercise their Right to First Refusal and allowed them to retain possession of the shops if they opt not to participate in the auction.
The Karnataka High Court ruled on a second appeal concerning a property dispute, where the appellants contested the lower court's decision that had favored the plaintiffs. The court examined substantial questions of law regarding the maintainability of the plaintiffs' suit and ultimately upheld the appellate court's decree in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a declaration of title and injunction.
Join 50,000+ legal professionals
