Delhi HC Quashes Bid Conditions in Gaurav Enterprises vs GTB Hospital (2026) held that The court held that the ratio of security supervisors to security guards must comply with the applicable regulations, specifically the Delhi Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Rules.
Gaurav Enterprises filed a writ petition against GTB Hospital challenging the bid documents for security services, claiming that the conditions imposed were unreasonable and violated regulatory requirements. The petitioner argued that the required number of security supervisors was insufficient and that the minimum turnover requirement excluded eligible bidders. The Delhi High Court ultimately ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the bid documents and directing the hospital to comply with legal standards regarding security personnel ratios. This decision emphasizes the importance of adherence to regulatory norms in public procurement processes.
The court held that the ratio of security supervisors to security guards must comply with the applicable regulations, specifically the Delhi Private Security Agencies (Regulation) Rules.
The requirement for a minimum average annual turnover of Rs. 25 crores was deemed unreasonable and not justifiable in relation to the bid value, potentially excluding eligible bidders.
The court emphasized the need for transparency and fairness in public procurement processes, ensuring that conditions do not create undue barriers for participation.
First bid document issued by GTB Hospital
Petitioner filed W.P.(C) 17151/2025
Join 50,000+ legal professionals
Second bid document issued by GTB Hospital
Final judgment delivered by Delhi High Court