Jharkhand HC Denies Anticipatory Bail to Alok Kumar Bharti in Employment Fraud Case (2026) held that The court determined that the petitioner was likely an accomplice in the alleged crime, which justified the denial of anticipatory bail.
Alok Kumar Bharti sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case involving allegations of duping individuals for employment. The petitioner claimed to be falsely implicated and argued that he was a victim of circumstances. The State opposed the bail, citing the petitioner's alleged complicity with Rakesh Roushan, who had confessed to the crime. The court ultimately rejected the bail application, concluding that the petitioner was likely an accomplice in the alleged offenses.
The court determined that the petitioner was likely an accomplice in the alleged crime, which justified the denial of anticipatory bail.
Confessions and witness statements against the petitioner were deemed sufficient to reject the bail application.
The court emphasized the seriousness of the allegations involving duping individuals for employment.
Case registered against the petitioner
Final judgment delivered rejecting anticipatory bail
Join 50,000+ legal professionals