MP HC Grants Bail to Firoz in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Evidence (2026) held that The court emphasized that bail can be granted when there is no tangible evidence connecting the applicant to the alleged crime.
Firoz was implicated in a drug-related case involving the seizure of MD and poppy straw. He filed a bail application after being in custody since October 7, 2025, arguing he was falsely implicated based solely on a co-accused's disclosure. The court found no tangible evidence linking him to the crime and granted bail, subject to conditions. The ruling emphasized the lack of direct evidence against Firoz despite his criminal history.
The court emphasized that bail can be granted when there is no tangible evidence connecting the applicant to the alleged crime.
The decision highlighted the importance of evaluating the credibility of evidence, particularly when it relies on disclosure statements from co-accused.
The court set conditions for bail, including regular appearances at the police station, reflecting a balance between liberty and monitoring due to the applicant's criminal antecedents.
Applicant arrested and taken into custody
Final judgment delivered granting bail
Join 50,000+ legal professionals