Mukhtar Abdul Pasha,Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(2)
Parties Involved
Mukhtar Abdul Pasha
Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(2)
AI Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of Mukhtar Abdul Pasha by condoning a delay of 38 days in filing the appeal against the order of the CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the delay was unintentional and due to the appellant's lack of awareness of the earlier order, thus enabling the case to be heard on its merits.
Order Text
Mukhtar Abdul Pasha,Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(2)(2), ... on 20 January, 2026 ITA No.1862/Bang/2025 Mukhtar Abdul Pasha, Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "B'' BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1862/Bang/2025 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Mukhtar Abdul Pasha 83/12, 1st Floor, 1st Main Road Kalasipalyam ITO Ward 5(2)(2) Vs. Bengaluru 560 002 Bengaluru PAN NO : AGRPP1235H APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Sri H. Guruswamy, A.R. Respondent by : Sri Subramanian, D.R. Date of Hearing : 13.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 20.01.2026 ORDER PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This Appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 19.05.2025 vide DIN and Order No: ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1076294587(1) passed u/s. 250 of the income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") for the AY 2011- 12. 2. The assessee has raised the following Grounds of appeal:- ITA No.1862/Bang/2025 Mukhtar Abdul Pasha, Bangalore Page 2 of 14 ITA No.1862/Bang/2025 Mukhtar Abdul Pasha, Bangalore Page 3 of 14 3. At the outset, as stated by the AR of the assessee, there is a delay of 38 days in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. The ld. A.R. of the assessee also drew our attention to an affidavit filed in original sworn before the notary public stating therein the cause for the delay along with an application for condonation of delay both dated 25.08.2025, which ...
